Top Secret

January 31, 2011

In July, 1947 a UFO crashed in Roswell, New Mexico, and the government tried to cover it up by saying that it was not a flying saucer but an experimental high-altitude surveillance balloon belonging to a classified program named, “Mogul.”

However, many proponents of the UFO theory claim that a crashed alien aircraft and bodies were recovered and that the military staged an elaborate cover-up because it was a threat to national security.  Now, 64 years later, the debate is still going on and the government is no more cooperative about revealing the details than it was then.

Throughout the years, it has been shown time and again that information that was originally classified as confidential because it was a threat to national security, remained classified many decades later even though the crisis had long since passed and no threat remained.  It has also been seen that anytime the government needed an excuse for anything, they only had to say that the information was classified.

In the United States we have run into this kind of obfuscation time and again so when President Obama announced to the world that we were going to have transparency in government, I was overjoyed.  It meant that we were finally going to see what went on behind the scenes with Congress.  It meant that we could turn on C-SPAN and be privy to the wheeling and dealing of our legislators as they bargained for earmarks.

This has had a so-so effect.  Not much has changed.  Enter WikiLeaks.  At first I was thrilled at the prospect that what I’ve wanted for years was finally happening.

Hundreds of thousands of confidential papers were being aired publicly.  The bad guys were being excoriated in the press and the good guys were going to win the war of public opinion and maybe even bring about some good governments.  But it isn’t turning out that way.

There are no clear-cut winners and losers and the head of WikiLeaks has had problems within his own ranks as well as being in trouble with the law of several countries, ours included.

Understandably, the guys who have committed the worst offenses want him out of the way and everyone is taking guesses as to how long he will remain alive before someone kills him.  The people in OpenLeaks is doing this a little differently; they are leaking the information to the media in bits and pieces and letting them take the blame for the leaks, hence, presumably, no one’s life is on the line while this classified information reaches the public in a safer form of whistle-blowing.

I’m one of the people who has been in favor of what WikiLeaks and OpenLeaks are trying to do.  I’m tired of all this secrecy and I do want it to stop.  And if that was all there was to it, I’d hitch my wagon to it and ride out the storm of controversy.

But now it has taken a much more sinister turn.  It is no longer about public officials misusing and abusing power and corrupt and ruthless governments toppling; now it has come to the doorstep of the people; it has come into the lives of all of us.

Hackers, in their rallying cry for transparency and no more secrets, has taken to hacking into the files of banks and financial institutions.  Millions of depositors have had their personal information, their identities, and their lives stolen out from under them.  People who stood behind the precepts of WikiLeaks and OpenLeaks are now their victims.  

It’s still not clearly understood whether these hackers are part of WikiLeaks and OpenLeaks or are just hanging onto their coattails and operating on their own.  It doesn’t matter at this point whether they are independent agents or working in unison with WikiLeaks or OpenLeaks.  All that matters is that these people who have had their personal information hijacked, had nothing to do with the secrecy in government nor the corruption that ensued as a result.

These hackers have taken it a step too far and it’s time for them to reassess their objectives and find a better way to attain them without causing the rest of the world to come toppling down around them . . .  Unless, of course, that is their intent.

This entry was posted on at and is filed under Politics. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

4 Responses to “Top Secret”

  1. isagenix says:

    I have a small background in magazine journalism but my new job requires no writing at all, except for emails. . . I would like to start doing some creative writing but I don’t know where to start, as in, what do I write about, and whether it’s actually worth bothering with or not. I’d probably be more inclined to do it if there was a competition or group I could join online or something like that. . . Does anyone do any writing or their own, if so, how did you get started? And what have you gotten out of it?.

    • Connie H. Deutsch says:

      In answer to your questions:
      1) I do all my own writing.
      2) You should write about the things you know about and the things you have experienced. Don’t try to be someone you’re not.
      3) Google lists a Free Articles Directory. Register with a couple of them and submit your articles. The most widely accepted articles and the most widely read articles are between 600 – 1,200 words. You can build up a large following and have the enjoyment of seeing your articles published in online magazines.
      4) As for how I got started… I had my own newspaper column for sixteen years. After they sold their newspaper, I took a break from writing and did other things. Three and a half years ago, I was looking for something else to do and one of my clients sent me a link to the Free Articles Directory and told me to submit articles to some of the online magazine publishers. I registered with a couple of online magazines and within a few hours of publication, other magazines picked up my first article and published it on their websites and in their magazines. Within a month or two, about thirty publishers were picking up my articles and publishing them in their magazines. Some of my articles have had as many as 45 million views, some as few as a couple of hundred. You won’t get paid for your articles but you’ll have the satisfaction of seeing your name in print in some very respected publications.
      5) As for what I get out of it, I get the satisfaction that I have a platform to express my views on a very wide variety of subjects and that I am drawing attention to matters that are close to my heart. I also have the satisfaction of being able to send some of my clients who have writing ability, to having their own articles published.

      Good luck with your writing. I wish you great success and enjoyment.

      Connie H. Deutsch

  2. ufo says:

    UFO remain unidentified till a rational rationalization are available to recognize them. Jumping from going to a UFO to yet another summary that it is an alien spacecraft is however another query, which is just what demands the evidence.Some kind of double turn on ufo sightings.

    • Connie H. Deutsch says:

      Unfortunately, the government is still trying to cover up the evidence that there are flying saucers and that a lot of people have seen them. Some even remember interacting with them, e.g., the renowned writer, Whitley Strieber. Almost all of the astronauts have reported seeing UFOs and, still, the government is denying their existence.

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Back to Top